On Thu, 01 Aug 2013 13:19:20 +0000, spud-u-dont-like wrote:

a bit more vacuous bluster to try to derail inspection

I notice you snipped the awkward question again.

... do your clearly and frequently expressed beliefs about restricting
road use for zero-VED-paying cyclists apply to zero-VED-paying
drivers, too?

It's a simple question, and surely a yes or no answer will cover it.

I think it's fairly clear now that you're trying to avoid answering the
question, which can really only lead to one conclusion. That VED is a red
herring, and it's the bicycle itself which your objections pertain to.
The rest is just bluster to try to hide your true motives.

Yes or No?