Thread
:
Barclays Boris bikes sponsorship to end in 2015
View Single Post
#
5
December 11th 13, 05:15 PM
Robin9
Senior Member
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Feb 2011
Location: Leyton, East London
Posts: 902
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Roland Perry
In message , at 10:25:48 on Wed, 11
Dec 2013, Peter CS
ils remarked:
Caroline Pidgeon, leader of the London Assembly's Liberal Democrat
group, said: "Barclays have received immense benefits from the
publicity given to the cycle hire scheme in its early years, but now
that its performance is looking shaky they appear to be bailing out.
I wonder how many people are influenced to open an account with Barclays
because of the sponsorship. Few people in England can be unaware that
Barclays exists and is a bank - and if they aren't, Barclays (like most
banks these days) doesn't brand itself as 'Barclays Bank' so just seeing
the name on a bike won't help.
Conversely I wonder how many think that a bank that uses their money to
paint its name on bikes is maybe one to avoid.
So how 'immense' are the benefits?
I think it comes under the umbrella of "Corporate Social Responsibility"
rather than "advertising", and many large companies have significant
such budgets. Wikipedia has a page on CSR, which covers most of the
rationale.
--
Roland Perry
Yes, but Caroline Pidgeon has forthrightly declared that Barclays Bank has
received great benefits from this sponsorship. Does anyone know what she is
referring to? Does she herself know? If there really were great advantages to
Barclays from this arrangement, why are they so casually pulling out? The
death toll is not attributable to them and does not reflect badly on them. It's
Boris Johnson who needs to cover his back on this issue.
Reply With Quote
Robin9
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Robin9
Find all posts by Robin9