View Single Post
  #12   Report Post  
Old June 17th 14, 08:06 AM posted to cam.transport,uk.transport.london
Roland Perry Roland Perry is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Aug 2003
Posts: 10,125
Default What's it(!) with Uber?

In message , at 08:45:56 on Tue, 17
Jun 2014, Rupert Moss-Eccardt remarked:
It doesn't have to *be* in two districts at once. Just DEEMED to be FOR
THE PURPOSES OF HACKNEY HAILING ONLY.

Would occupants be liable to pay council tax to both district
councils? And maybe a double-dose to the county?


Of course not, it's only in South Cambs.


Roland,

Are you really proposing that local authorities should have the power
to change the law as they see fit?


They do it all the time. Every speed limit change or new yellow line for
example. Ely recently changed the law applying to the Broad Street car
park (such that it's now half and half long/short stay). They also
changed the law to allow cycling along quay/riverside footpath, which I
don't agree with but they did it anyway.

Any law? What criteria would you apply for choosing which ones are
changeable?


They clearly have the power to change traffic laws, and have lots of
discretion for taxi licensing (who they allow to become drivers, what
the tests are for vehicle and drivers, who they'll permit to be
"authorised" to use the rising bollards etc). This would simply be a
small change in the conditions for a City hackney licence that would say
"only hailable in the City *but also at the taxi rank at Science Park
Station*")
--
Roland Perry