What's it(!) with Uber?
On 17/06/2014 00:04, JNugent wrote:
On 16/06/2014 17:18, Roland Perry wrote:
Because I'm not talking about the status of the land, it could be owned
by Father Xmas for all I care. What matters is whether it's "inside
South Cambs" or "inside the City" for hackney-hailing purposes.
All that's needed is a derogation which says that for taxi-hailing
purposes it's deemed to be in both.
Is that legally possible? Can one spot be in two districts
simultaneously?
As long as nobody looks at it.
--
Arthur Figgis Surrey, UK
|