View Single Post
  #12   Report Post  
Old September 2nd 14, 10:51 AM posted to uk.transport.london
Roland Perry Roland Perry is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Aug 2003
Posts: 10,125
Default As predicted, Boris Island sunk

In message , at 11:18:08 on
Tue, 2 Sep 2014, Recliner remarked:
On Tue, 2 Sep 2014 10:50:48 +0100, Roland Perry
wrote:

In message , at 10:44:46 on
Tue, 2 Sep 2014, Recliner remarked:
The new terminal will be between the old and new runways, no further
from the station than the current North Terminal (with its shuttle
train).

If it's the other side of the existing runway, it'll be a lot further
from the current south terminal than the north terminal is.


No it won't. The new terminal will be quite thin and east-west between
the runways.


So, roughly slightly south of where the A23 runs today?


North is the impression I get from this pictu

http://www.gatwickobviously.com/debate

The proposal is to keep the most valuable "hub" flights at Heathrow
and move the more point-to-point ones to Gatwick.

But how do you decide that the point-to-point flights don't support
the hub flights?


Because you have access to the information about who is taking which
flight, and hence which pairs of flights have the most people
transiting.


That would imply a move forced on reluctant airlines, who would no
doubt sue to keep their much more valuable Heathrow slots. I can't
imagine a single airline would want to move a single flight from
Heathrow to Gatwick without massive compensation.


I'm not suggesting they'll cancel existing slots, but new ones will only
be available at Gatwick. The airlines will have to decide where to
juggle their flights.
--
Roland Perry