View Single Post
  #57   Report Post  
Old October 27th 14, 08:47 AM posted to uk.transport.london
Recliner[_3_] Recliner[_3_] is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Oct 2014
Posts: 2,990
Default TfL to possibly buy 200 extra New Bus for London

Roland Perry wrote:
In message
, at 03:39:08 on Mon, 27 Oct 2014, Recliner remarked:
Not permanently locked ones, but a brake in the diff (rather that at the wheel).

What would be gained by duplicating the function?

Braking a wheel isn't the same as locking a diff. Apart from anything
else, the locked diff still powers both wheels.


No it's not the same, but it's what traction control is. And ASC can still
power both wheels, independently reducing torque on each wheel to the level
that the tyre's grip can sustain. That provides more traction than a simple
locked diff.


A locked diff is providing traction via the non-slipping wheel, except
the "slipping" one isn't - because it's rotating at the same speed as the
"non-slipping" one - and is therefore well placed to start providing
traction as soon as road adhesion returns to that side.


With ASC, each wheel is provided with just enough traction to stop it
spinning, so *both* wheels are providing whatever traction they can, and
neither is either spinning or locked. That's much better than a locked diff
which is, at best, optimising traction for just one wheel.