On 2015\10\01 20:33, Steve Fitzgerald wrote:
In message , Paul Corfield
writes
... the timescale was rumoured to be slipping, according to Modern
Railways, but the contract has now been let.
http://www.railtechnologymagazine.co...sons-to-carry-
out-electrification-of-gospel-oak-barking-route?dorewrite=false
I had no idea that Barking platform one was not electrified! Won't it
become disused when the Barking Reach extension is built?
In theory yes but I'd want a bolt hole for the trains in case a
freight train does something stupid east of Barking or C2C have a rare
breakdown. Makes no sense to throw away an important facility and we
haven't got the TWA process started never mind signed off for the
Barking Riverside extension. New Mayor in May 2016 may have other
ideas [1] that could force a change in requirements.
[1] e.g. build a tunnel to Thamesmead as part of the initial scope or
a very early follow on piece of work. That'd force different
requirements at Barking Reach that could affect the scope of the TWAO.
Extend the H&C maybe?
Under the catenary?