View Single Post
  #46   Report Post  
Old December 30th 15, 03:54 AM posted to uk.transport.london
Basil Jet[_4_] Basil Jet[_4_] is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Sep 2014
Posts: 1,385
Default By Northern Line to Battersea

On 2015\12\30 04:30, Recliner wrote:
Basil Jet wrote:
On 2015\12\29 22:11, Recliner wrote:
wrote:

Would be nice if they made them walk through. God knows, the northern line
trains need every bit of extra space they can get in the rush hour.

Extremely unlikely. There isn't time for an all-new articulated design,
plus it would be hard to keep them externally similar.


According to
http://www.lurs.org.uk/articles13_ht...ATT ERSEA.pdf

Nine Elms and Battersea will only have "passive provision" for PEDs.

Although, I can't imagine what passive provision for PEDs might be...
sufficiently large power cables leading to the platforms?


Straight and level platforms? Strong enough structure to support the PED
frames?

But the real reason for the train doors being the same size and position is
because the new trains will also be used on the Jubilee line, which needs a
larger fleet.


Although they could just transfer some 95s to the Jubilee Line and put
all of the new trains on the Northern. That actually sounds preferable
from a maintenance point of view, assuming the 95s and 96s are more
similar to each other than either will be to the new trains. Ultimately
you would want only one line of the three (Jubilee, Fitzroy, Stane
Street) to have any new trains, perhaps an entirely new fleet.