Thread: By Northern Line to Battersea
View Single Post
  #80   Report Post  
Old December 31st 15, 01:25 PM posted to uk.transport.london
Basil Jet[_4_] Basil Jet[_4_] is offline
external usenet poster
  
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Sep 2014
Posts: 1,385
Default By London's Northern Line to Battersea
On 2015\12\31 12:42, wrote:
In article ,
(e27002 aurora) wrote:

On Thu, 31 Dec 2015 04:56:37 -0600,
wrote:

In article ,
 (e27002 aurora) wrote:

One has to wonder where the Metropolitan Line would be today sans the
destructive forces of the LTPB, LT, LRT, and TfL.

The Metropolitan Railway was a fine organization. Would that it had
survived.

Like the Southern, with half-hourly services to every one of varied
destinations from Baker Street?

IIRC the Southern Railway aimed for 20 minute services to its suburban
stations. It was the Southern Region that reduced them to thirty
minutes.

The Metropolitan was a full service railway with staffed stations and
trains. It was a freight, livestock, and parcels carrier. It used
rolling stock suitable for the services in question.

In conjunction with the LNER many of these services could have
continued. Certainly over time it would have evolved into a modern
suburban railway.

My point precisely. Not a metro that it now is.


I don't know what point you're making. What's the difference between a
metro and a suburban railway? Which is better?
Reply With QuoteReply With Quote