View Single Post
  #11   Report Post  
Old January 15th 16, 11:29 AM posted to uk.railway,uk.transport.london
Mike Bristow Mike Bristow is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Jul 2003
Posts: 464
Default Inspector Sands and his pals

["Followup-To:" header set to uk.transport.london.]
In article ,
Recliner wrote:
The Real Doctor wrote:
"Flight level - "A fancy way of telling you how many thousands of feet
you are above sea level. Just add a couple of zeroes. Flight level
three-three zero is 33,000 feet.""


Is that wrong? [Yes, I know it's the barometric altitude, but that's not
something that's normally mentioned.]


The use of FLxxx rather altitude is precisely to avoid having to
work out what your height above sea level is. In other words, by
bringing in "above sea level" they've negated the whole purpose of
Flight levels.

Also, it's hundreds of feet, not thousands.

Also it's not feet everywhere.


--
Mike Bristow