London Banter - View Single Post

e27002 aurora

On Sat, 16 Jan 2016 11:51:16 +0100, Robin9
wrote:
[color=blue][i]

'Recliner[_3_ Wrote:
;153217']Robin9 wrote:-

'Recliner[_3_ Wrote: -
;153191']On Thu, 14 Jan 2016 18:26:44 +0100, Robin9
wrote:
-

;153065 Wrote: -
In article , (Basil
Jet)
wrote:
-
I was thinking about what a wasted resource the DC lines from Queens
Park to Euston are. A twin track railway to the edge of Central
London with only 3tph. But what to do with it?-

Surely the real pressure is to turf the suburban services out to
provide

more mainline and HS2 capacity?

Colin Rosenstiel-

Is diverting the service away from Euston via Camden Road
to wherever a feasible option?-

Wouldn't it be easier to simply replace the LO service to Watford
Junction with the Bakerloo? It might have to wait till the Bakerloo
gets new stock in a few years time, of course.-

Certainly it would be simpler but would it be practicable?
I assume the Bakerloo Line is as overcrowded during rush
hour as any other Underground service. Would adding to it
the people who currently travel on the Overground service to
Euston be workable? -

I thought the Bakerloo was the least (over) crowded of the LU lines?
-

We came back to the beginning of this thread: the DC lines to
Euston are an under-utilised asset. Abandoning the service does
address that issue.-

I assume you meant "does NOT address"? That's true, but it does free
up
the LO Euston platforms for other services. On the other hand, a more
intensive LO service to make better use of the track pair would need
more
Euston platforms, which will be in short supply during the HS2
rebuilding.

You're quite right. I meant "not address." I've amended my post.

Living in Leyton, I never have any reason to travel on the
Bakerloo during rush hour. If it is less busy than other lines,
is it to the extent of being able to absorb refugees from an
abandoned Watford/Euston service?

I come back to my original suggestion. Diverting the service
via Camden Road would free up platforms at Euston while still
utilising the bulk of the route south of Willesden Junction. Is
this idea workable?

IMHO possibly yes.