Thread: Forest Gategate
View Single Post
  #22   Report Post  
Old March 3rd 16, 05:33 AM posted to uk.transport.london
Mike Bristow Mike Bristow is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Jul 2003
Posts: 464
Default Forest Gategate

In article ,
Robin9 wrote:

Mike Bristow;154290 Wrote:

Robin9 wrote this bit:
TfL are peddling flannel, The Standard is telling the truth.
The distance between Forest Gate Station and Wanstead Park
Station is far greater than the distances at West Hampstead.-


Er, not really. Forest Gate - Wanstead Park is ~200-250m; so is
West Hampstead Tube - West Hampstead Thameslink. While the West
Hampstead link might be marginally shorter, they're certainly in
the same ballpark.


I drove down Woodgrange Road today past the two stations a few
hours before reading your post. Next time I'll re-set my clock and
measure the distance.

This morning I met a woman who has severe back problems as
has her 70 year old mother. She told me she has difficulties in
walking or standing up for long periods. I explained the bone of
contention in this thread and asked her opinion. She affirmed
that my argument is correct and that for people with mobility
problems, being obliged to walk between stations is onerous.


That wasn't the point I was responding to; you originally said
that the distance between Forest Gate and Wanstead Park is far
greater than the distances at West Hampstead.

That is simply not true.

There is, perhaps, an interesting debate to be had about how close
two platforms can be to count as an interchange; my suspicion is
that Forest Gate / Wanstead Park are close enough for any sensible
gap - if they're not, then interchanges between the Central Line
and Northern at Bank probably don't count either.


--
Mike Bristow