Whatever John Biggs' motives are, the fact that these contracts
will now be completed five years later than planned means that
TfL has some explaining to do. TfL should also explain why
"the wording of the contract meant it had to pay the company
for the money it had spent rather than the value of its work."

TfL might additionally explain how and why they were duped
into believing Bombardier could bring the contract in at £800M
less than now seems possible.

Like Mr. Biggs, I'm not an admirer of TfL. In this situation I say
more power to his elbow. I hope he nails TfL and the twerp
Johnson to the barnyard door.