"Recliner" wrote in message
...
Optimist wrote:
On Fri, 15 Jul 2016 14:46:28 -0000 (UTC), Recliner
wrote:

Optimist wrote:
On Fri, 15 Jul 2016 14:29:11 -0000 (UTC), Recliner
wrote:

Roland Perry wrote:
In message , at 13:11:32 on Fri, 15
Jul
2016, Graham Murray remarked:

irrespective of the vote the UK will remain a member of the EU for
at
least 2 years and until we actually leave we will continue to enjoy
the
benefits, and endure the downsides, of EU membership.

I don't think we'll continue to have the benefit of influencing any
future EU legislation, including those which will affect us for ever
in
a "Norway solution".

Yes, from now and till the end of 2018 we will continue to bear all
the
costs of EU membership, but the benefits will dwindle. For example,
our
participation in new EU funded research projects has already fizzled
out,
where we were previously disproportionately represented.

Then the shortfall should be paid by the UK treasury, and deducted from
the amount paid to Brussels.

It's not so simple. Countries are not rewarded with research
participation
based on their EU contributions. They are included because their
universities are appropriate participants. We have the best EU
universities
and so were included disproportionately; now, knowing we will soon be
gone,
our universities are not considered for inclusion in new EU-funded
projects, as their work may not be funded after 2018.

Same answer - fund our OWN universities from the amount we pay in EU
contributions.

Which will cost us more, and exclude us from multi-national EU research
projects.

You've already said (correctly) that the UK has the best (by a very long
way) universities in the EU

do you really think that, in the long term, they are going to be excluded
from cross country research projects because of some political argy bargy?

tim