View Single Post
  #323   Report Post  
Old July 18th 16, 10:42 PM posted to uk.railway,uk.transport.london
Charles Ellson[_2_] Charles Ellson[_2_] is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Sep 2012
Posts: 498
Default Will Brexit lead to the abandonment of Crossrail2 and Turning South London Orange?

On Mon, 18 Jul 2016 20:18:19 +0100, Roland Perry
wrote:

In message , at 18:30:37 on Mon, 18 Jul
2016, tim... remarked:
It's every much the same sort of thing: banning a commodity because
it's harmful/unethical or whatever.


There is a mile of difference between unethical and harmful, especially
when in normal use the item isn't harmful at all, it's only harmful if
it's abused.


Ivory hunting is harmful to elephants.

The reason I mentioned that one example (rather than say a pesticide)
is that sufficiently old examples have grandfather rights. Which you
might be suggesting doesn't apply to mercury instruments??


The grandfather rights to antique mercury based instruments apply to
unrepaired ones (whether still working or otherwise).

as soon as they (the mechanism) is newly repaired they have to follow
the same rules as newly made, which means that their sale is banned.


Cite? If true, I agree; but I've never come across a situation that a
repaired grandfathered item is suddenly ungrandfathered.

Advice such as
https://www.gov.uk/government/upload...5/LIT_7498.pdf
[Mercury in Measuring Devices-Guidance Note-November 2015 (Version 3)]
refers to restrictions of sale of items to the general public not
applying to -
(a) measuring devices more than 50 years old on 3 October
2007;
(b) barometers (except barometers within point (a)) until 3
October 2009.

Whether or not one of those items has been repaired seems not to be
considered.