View Single Post
  #6   Report Post  
Old August 30th 16, 10:28 PM posted to uk.transport.london
Graham Harrison[_3_] Graham Harrison[_3_] is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Dec 2014
Posts: 16
Default Quicker to walk?

On Tue, 30 Aug 2016 08:15:44 +0100, "tim..."
wrote:


"Recliner" wrote in message
...
I don't know how long this has been around, but I'd not seen it befo

"Walking can be a quick and easy way to get around, particularly when
travelling during the busiest times, which are 08:00-09:00 and 17:30-18:30
Monday to Friday. The table below shows some popular journeys within zones
1 and 2 that are quicker to walk."

http://content.tfl.gov.uk/walking-tu...rney-times.pdf





I don't believe that there's a single person in the whole world who gets the
tube from Bayswater to Queensway, or Gt Portland St to Regents Park.

It's bleeding obvious to anyone who has a map, that when you are standing at
one of these stations that then other one of the pair is 2 minutes walk up
the road.

What does happen though is that people making a longer journey make a change
to get to one of the stations when they could have stayed on the line that
they are on to get to its pair.

tim



I once stopped a colleague trying to take the tube from Lancaster Gate
to Paddington. A bit further than Bayswater to Queensway but still
much, much faster than the tube.

Even longer distances can be competitive. I met several colleagues
on a train into Paddington. We were all going to Victoria Coach
Station. They took the Circle (as it was then) and I walked across
the park and arrived 3 minutes after they did.

I often think that one of the problems is that we all call the
Underground map a map. It's a diagram and if people understood that
some (but not all) would find out about the alternatives.