London Banter - View Single Post

tim... · November 18th 16, 11:55 AM posted to uk.railway,uk.transport.london

"Graeme Wall" wrote in message
news

On 17/11/2016 18:59, Optimist wrote:
On Thu, 17 Nov 2016 18:44:59 +0000, Graeme Wall
wrote:

On 17/11/2016 17:00, Optimist wrote:
On Thu, 17 Nov 2016 09:37:17 +0000 (UTC), d wrote:

On Wed, 16 Nov 2016 17:53:06 +0000
Arthur Figgis wrote:
On 16/11/2016 09:13, Optimist wrote:

There's another aspect here though - the referendum. Legislation
for this
had been passed by
Parliament last year. The people were told that the decision was
theirs,

But who told them that? Or was the idea that it might be binding just
an
assumption made by the kind of people who don't talk about trains
using
a obscure format from the dark age of online communications?

The whole parliament must ratify nonsense is just another ploy by
Remoaners
to block Brexit. Parliment exists to enact the will of the people,
however if
the will of the people has already been made perfectly clear via a
referendum
then the role of parliament is redundant in the matter. And whats
more - if
parliament go against the will of the people then we're sliding into a
parliamentary dictatorship.

All UK needs to do is to repeal the European Communities Act and tell
the EU to make personal use of
a taxidermist.

To repeal the ECA requires that it be put before parliament, something
that May is trying to avoid.

Invoking Article 50 not the same as repealing the ECA.

You've noticed.

I still seems to be you who hasn't noticed (purely on the basis of this
converstaion)

tim