View Single Post
  #26   Report Post  
Old January 19th 17, 08:58 AM posted to uk.transport.london
[email protected] spud@potato.field is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Oct 2015
Posts: 1,044
Default The next doomed Stansted NYC business jet

On Wed, 18 Jan 2017 16:16:01 -0000 (UTC)
Recliner wrote:
wrote:
On Wed, 18 Jan 2017 15:43:14 -0000 (UTC)
Recliner wrote:
Roland Perry wrote:
In message , at 15:04:59 on Wed, 18 Jan
2017, d remarked:

737s are bad enough. I can't imagine spending 8 hours bouncing across the
atlantic in something not much bigger than a minibus, comfortable seats or
not.

Perhaps they fly around the turbulence?

Some business jets fly higher and faster than airliners.


Some storm clouds go up to 60K feet. The only civil aircraft that could go
over them would be concorde.


If they're flying above the normal air routes, they probably have more
freedom to pick/change their own route.


Does an executive jet have enough range to divert around a huge atlantic front,
some of which can span thousands of miles?

--
Spud