In message , at 14:49:00 on
Sun, 22 Jan 2017, Recliner remarked:
They are extremely long escalators.
Not compared to the ones down to the Heathrow T5 transit or the T2
walkways:
https://www.flickr.com/photos/recliner/28105847650/in/album-72157671130714396
Looks about the same to me.
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikiped...ck_North_Termi
nal_escalator_up_to_Pier_6_passenger_bridge.JPG
No, that's clearly much shorter.
fsvo "much" - counting the steps about a third shorter. But why does
greater inconvenience at Heathrow excuse deliberate inconvenience at
Gatwick?
Where's the 'deliberate inconvenience' in Gatwick? Your Bellysian
plan would be far worse, and more expensive to boot.
The current pier 6 works well in Gatwick, and it would be unacceptable
if linked to the end of an already overlong pier by an even longer,
higher bridge than it has now.
Because you wouldn't need a bridge - access to the gates in question
would be via the taxi-way that didn't need to be bridged.
--
Roland Perry