February 9th 17, 02:49 PM
posted to uk.transport.london,uk.railway
|
|
external usenet poster
|
|
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Oct 2014
Posts: 2,990
|
|
Network Rail "incorrectly designed" the Gospel Oak -Barking improvements
wrote:
On Thu, 9 Feb 2017 10:17:56 +0000
Roland Perry wrote:
In message
-septe
mber.org, at 09:20:11 on Thu, 9 Feb 2017, Recliner
remarked:
http://www.networkrailmediacentre.co...spel-oak-to-ba
king-route-to-reopen-on-monday-27-february-but-further-work-
is-required
http://www.barking-gospeloak.org.uk/...ss_release.pdf
It looks like NR is trying to pass the blame on to the contractors:
"Along the 14-mile route, a number of the structures, which carry the
overhead lines, were incorrectly designed and couldn’t be installed at the
planned locations. Late delivery of materials and structures also led to
further delays."
I think NR would have used different words if the faults had been its own.
NR's fault is (once again) lack of project management and performing
checks on what was being designed/manufactured.
Of course, if they'd simply installed 3rd rail they could have done it in a
couple of months while the line carried on running. But thanks to stupid DoT
rules about no new 3rd rail they've had to close the line for god knows how
long inconveniencing 10s of thousands of people and spent 100m.
The line also carries freight, which will be hauled by 25kV locos.
|