London Banter - View Single Post - Network Rail "incorrectly designed" the Gospel Oak

Recliner[_3_] · February 15th 17, 01:18 PM posted to uk.transport.london

On Wed, 15 Feb 2017 13:54:13 +0000 (UTC), d wrote:

On Wed, 15 Feb 2017 10:26:31 -0000 (UTC)
Recliner wrote:
wrote:
On Wed, 15 Feb 2017 09:48:06 -0000 (UTC)
Recliner wrote:
wrote:
On Tue, 14 Feb 2017 16:42:55 -0000 (UTC)
Recliner wrote:
wrote:
On Tue, 14 Feb 2017 16:07:14 -0000 (UTC)
Recliner wrote:
wrote:
The DC line is mostly 6-carriage platforms.

I'm sure if TfL/Bombardier got stephen hawking and some rocket
scientists
on
a
retainer they could after some serious brainstorming sessions figure
out
a
way
to build a 6 car 378.

Oi, pay attention, the naughty boy at the back!

As already mentioned in this thread and others, the DC line will be
getting
new 4-car Aventras to replace the 5-car 378s. So, far from any rocket
scientists, it won't even need any retards like you to figure out a way
to
build 6-car 378s. There won't be any more 378s built.

So you're answer to why they're not using 378s on the goblin is because
they're not.

Please translate that into English?

Sorry, I was trying to comprehend your tortured logic. Clearly I failed
probably because there wasn't any to start with.

I realise English isn't your native language, but I wonder if your
translator generated "you're" instead of "your" in that garbled sentence?
Perhaps you're using obsolete software to translate what passes for your
thoughts into English?

Awww, have you really had to fall back on pointing out typos? Never mind,
don't get upset, you'll think up a proper counterpoint again one day!

They're not typos. They're illiteracy.

Your translation software needs upgrading.

You're on thin ice here since I'm damn sure if I searched back through all
your posts I could find some typos but I have better things to do with my
life. If you're idea of a riposte is typo spotting then knock yourself out
but you're simply coming across as desperate.

I know you have trouble comprehending, as well as writing, English,
but if you slowly re-read what I wrote, you may manage to understand
that I was not pointing typos, which we all make.

I was pointing out that your bile generator is illiterate, which makes
many of your posts hard to understand (perhaps that's a mercy?).
Perhaps you could seek the assistance of a native English speaker?

When its a continuation of a previous order that rule generally doesn't apply
which is how they managed to build all those extra cars to extend the ELL
trains to 5 cars.

It's not a continuation of an existing order.

If TfL had had any forsight it could easily have been.

Why are you so convinced that TfL would want to be buying more of an
obsolete design, when an improved, more efficient model is available?
Not everyone is as thick as you.