On Wed, 15 Feb 2017 14:18:27 +0000
Recliner wrote:
You're on thin ice here since I'm damn sure if I searched back through all
your posts I could find some typos but I have better things to do with my
life. If you're idea of a riposte is typo spotting then knock yourself out
but you're simply coming across as desperate.

I know you have trouble comprehending, as well as writing, English,

Says the man who just added a redundant comma after "writing" (yes, it is,
don't even bother to argue otherwise). Ah , that nice warm feeling of irony

but if you slowly re-read what I wrote, you may manage to understand
that I was not pointing typos, which we all make.

Don't back pedal, its pathetic.

I was pointing out that your bile generator is illiterate, which makes
many of your posts hard to understand (perhaps that's a mercy?).

No, they're not hard to understand for anyone who isn't in the first stages
of senility unlike you.

Why are you so convinced that TfL would want to be buying more of an
obsolete design, when an improved, more efficient model is available?
Not everyone is as thick as you.

I've already stated why. But I guess it was all a bit complex for you to
follow so you decided to hunt for typos instead. I guess being a senior
citizen your get tired quickly and the old brain gets a bit foggy doesn't it?

--
Spud