View Single Post
  #10   Report Post  
Old May 26th 04, 04:43 PM posted to uk.transport.london
TheOneKEA TheOneKEA is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Nov 2003
Posts: 138
Default Cost of big and small tubes

AyrAlex wrote:
Tom Anderson wrote:

wouldn't it have made sense to build the underground to be
compatible with the rest of the network, as, AIUI, in Tokyo?



Digressing a bit, I've always wondered why the South coast of England
(mainly the South East) uses the 700V DC "third rail" system for electrical
power, when the entire rest of the UK uses the 25000V AC overhead cable
system. Wouldn't it make more sense to have the same used all over the UK?
It means that a lot of national-running trains have to be diesel.

I know little of the history of the Southern Railway, but I believe that
it was decided to let the electrification, parts of which were done back
in the time of Yerkes, to proceed apace - IIRC this electrification
contributed to the sparse tube coverage in South London.

Besides, wasn't 25kVAC thought up well after 700V DC anyway?

Brad