"Recliner" wrote in message
...
tim... wrote:


"Roland Perry" wrote in message
...
In message
-septe
mber.org, at 20:19:18 on Sat, 1 Apr 2017, Recliner
remarked:
The point about Uber's model is that they don't own them

but that doesn't mean that the driver does either - he could be
"borrowing"
it

(FTAOD - I'm not making some pedantic point about Lease-Hire)

The driver can't just turn up in a random borrowed vehicle. Uber must
approve, and knows exactly what car he drives. It presumably does some
checks on its ownership, suitability, whether it's licensed and insured
for
private hire, etc.

https://www.uber.com/en-GB/drive/lon...-requirements/

The main complaint is that they don't (do much checking). And reportedly
the problem with insurance is they don't track cancellations

I'm not even sure there's a mechanism for that even if they wanted to

Yes, they apparently contact the insurance company the driver claimed to
have a policy with,

well I guessed that they could do that

I just thought that doing that for 10,000 drivers, once a month (say) was
going to be too much aggro for both parties

and they could ask to be informed if the policy lapsed.
That may be even be available online.

It was this that I didn't thing was available

tim