View Single Post
  #12   Report Post  
Old April 8th 17, 02:49 PM posted to uk.transport.london
michael adams[_6_] michael adams[_6_] is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Jan 2012
Posts: 56
Default Tube driver: The Job is going down the pan


"Recliner" wrote in message
...
On Sat, 8 Apr 2017 14:46:03 +0100, "michael adams"
wrote:


"Basil Jet" wrote in message
news


when it's more that they will have a really horrific day
if a door opens unexpectedly and a few people fall off a moving tube train.


How many people other than his fellow drivers will accept that the
door opened "unexpectedly" for any other reason than that the
driver somehow opened it himself by accident ?


There's no way a driver could open a single passenger door while the
train was on the move, so no-one would blame him if it happened.


You may well know that, and his fellow drivers may well know that,
but do the general public ? If B J's example is allowed as a real
possibility, is it realistic to suppose that LU would immediately
own up to real possibility that their trains are at fault, without
first holding some sort of internal enquiry ?

The question was whether the reports of such door openings were
spurious.


Apparently there were five such reports, the latest Jan 16th one
at least involving a light in the cab indicating a door was open.
Quite where the spurious element comes in, drivers suffering from
hallucinations, deliberately lying, or faulty indicator lights
in the cabs I'm not sure. I rather wish B J hadn't raised this as
an example as now I'm rather intrigued to know how this issue
was resolved. If at all.


michael adams

....