Thread
:
New York Times on Crossrail
View Single Post
#
86
August 5th 17, 10:30 AM posted to uk.transport.london
[email protected]
external usenet poster
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Sep 2008
Posts: 4,877
New York Times on Crossrail
In article ,
(Roland Perry)
wrote:
In message , at
00:02:59 on Sat, 5 Aug 2017, Arthur Figgis
remarked:
But IEPs aren't expected on that line.
Aren't they...
No, all the ones on order are spoken for by VTEC and GWR.
Not true: do your research.
Cite please.
Class 802/2s have been ordered for Hull Trains (5) and TPE (19).
IEP is a DfT procurement programme, rather than a type of rolling
stock. The Hull Trains and TPE trains (and some of the GWR ones) are
being bought conventionally by "normal" ROSCOs, rather than as part of
the IEP.
While I agree with that, until an order is placed for class
800-something for the MML then it's just as much vapourware
as this for 'The North':
"... deploying alternative-fuel trains on the route by 2021",
the date for the MML refranchise,
the deadline for new tiolets in HSTs,
and most ludicrous: "hydrogen power".
ps. and there's always the weasel words - "subject to business case"
You forgot bionic duckweed. See Roger Ford /passim./
--
Colin Rosenstiel
Reply With Quote
[email protected]
View Public Profile
Find all posts by
[email protected]