Thread
:
New York Times on Crossrail
View Single Post
#
92
August 7th 17, 03:01 PM posted to uk.transport.london
Recliner[_3_]
external usenet poster
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Oct 2014
Posts: 2,990
New York Times on Crossrail
wrote:
On Mon, 07 Aug 2017 11:25:13 +0100
Recliner wrote:
On Mon, 7 Aug 2017 08:29:05 +0000 (UTC),
d wrote:
On Fri, 4 Aug 2017 16:31:33 +0100
Roland Perry wrote:
In message , at 13:28:13 on Fri, 4 Aug
2017,
d remarked:
Indeed what? Is knowing the precise junction layouts of the various
lines
a prerequsite of being able to discuss this?
No, but it would help you not look like a total prat.
When I start wearing an anorak and hanging around at the end of platforms
carrying a thermos flask and notebook I might give a ****. Until then...
....we will ignore everything you say, as you've now admitted it's
founded upon ignorance.
Feel free to point out where I said anything of the sort.
Your clearly admitted ignorance of the most basic details of the
Thameslink routes.
So not knowing about part of the new thameslink route means I don't know
anything at all? Oh how handwaving convenient for your limp riposte.
You've also previously demonstrated a complete lack of knowledge about
the Thameslink route from Blackfriars to London Bridge in the thread
you started entitled 'Blackfriars - London Bridge:
And? Like I've said, I wasn't interested in the thameslink project. How does
that translate to "everything"?
It's a reasonable assumption to make about any line you don't use
regularly.
Reply With Quote
Recliner[_3_]
View Public Profile
Find all posts by Recliner[_3_]