View Single Post
  #24   Report Post  
Old August 9th 17, 05:05 PM posted to uk.transport.london,misc.transport.urban-transit,uk.railway
e27002 aurora[_2_] e27002 aurora[_2_] is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Apr 2017
Posts: 45
Default London Waterloo international

On Wed, 9 Aug 2017 09:12:18 +0000 (UTC), d wrote:

On Wed, 9 Aug 2017 08:54:23 -0000 (UTC)
Recliner wrote:
wrote:
And surely the "hole" in the main concourse should have been covered,
rather than build a new remote concourse.

The best part is that in building this new concourse they've had to

drastically
shorten all but one of the platforms there so scuppering any possibility of
stabling two 8 car trains in them.


Is that meant to be fact, or just opinion?


A eurostar is approx 400m long. An 8 car 3rd rail EMU is 8*20 = 160m. x2 gives
320m. I'd have thought even you could have managed that maths. However now
they've lopped a considerable amount off the length of the platforms I doubt
two 8 cars would fit.

As for stabling 2 trains in the same platform - it happens elsewhere on the
network, why not at waterloo? Are you saying waterloo is somehow special?

There was plenty of room down below where
the old eurostar concourse and waiting areas were, but no, thats not in use
any more. No doubt it'll just be more shops in 5-10 years time when they

finally
get around to finishing the project.


How long do you think it is since this project started? How long will the
project take, from start to finish?


Well its taken BRB & NR 10 years to get this far, and its been over a year
since building work actually started for them to do frankly not very much.
I have little confidence the refurbishment of the 2 floors below will be
finished anytime soon.

More reason to make responsibility for track and infrastructure part
of the franchise commitment. D(a)ft and Network Rail together are
worthless.