View Single Post
  #65   Report Post  
Old August 11th 17, 08:36 AM posted to uk.railway,misc.transport.urban-transit,uk.transport.london
[email protected] spud@potato.field is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Oct 2015
Posts: 1,044
Default London Waterloo international

On Fri, 11 Aug 2017 08:10:03 -0000 (UTC)
Recliner wrote:
Graeme Wall wrote:
It effectively was while HS1 was still in its testing phase but there
were proposals that it would be a good idea to continue a passenger
service into Waterloo for those who found the UndergrounD too exotic.


I've found this old report from almost a decade ago

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/travel/eu...orm-controvers
-at-Waterloo.html

Little did they know…

"Plans to mothball five platforms at Waterloo for more than a year before
bringing them into use to ease congestion has sparked outrage from rail
passenger groups.

The five platforms, vacated by Eurostar's move to St Pancras, are unlikely
to see any trains until December 2008, partly because Eurostar has an
agreement not to vacate them for another six months.



A spokesman for Network Rail said that six months' work would be needed
before the five platforms could be added to the 19 already in use at
Waterloo."


Someone should have got a good kicking for them lying idle for 10 years but
of course they won't because incompetance is par for the course with upper
management in government bodies.

--
Spud