Thread
:
New York Times on Crossrail
View Single Post
#
149
August 16th 17, 07:04 PM posted to uk.transport.london
Clank
external usenet poster
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Mar 2013
Posts: 166
New York Times on Crossrail
On 04.08.2017 12:48 PM,
d wrote:
On Thu, 03 Aug 2017 20:29:21 -0500
wrote:
In article ,
d () wrote:
On Thu, 03 Aug 2017 12:01:28 +0100
Recliner wrote:
On Thu, 3 Aug 2017 11:38:16 +0100, Roland Perry
wrote:
In message , at 08:36:44 on Thu, 3 Aug
2017,
d remarked:
As an aside, how do trains on the ECML get south of the river, where's
the link to the current thameslink route?
Slaps forehead
Indeed!
Indeed what? Is knowing the precise junction layouts of the various lines
a prerequsite of being able to discuss this?
No, but it would help you not look like a total prat.
When I start wearing an anorak and hanging around at the end of platforms
carrying a thermos flask and notebook I might give a ****. Until then...
As a curious observer, I'm interested to know how "wearing an anorak and
hanging around and the end of platforms" and "arguing on Usenet (of all the
places) about things you're ignorant of like an Asperger's sufferer without
the good points" compare in terms of social acceptability, in spudworld?
It looks like virgins fighting over who pretended to buy a packet of condoms
to me...
Reply With Quote
Clank
View Public Profile
Find all posts by Clank