On Wed, 16 Aug 2017 19:28:53 -0000 (UTC)
Clank wrote:
On 15.08.2017 7:00 PM, d wrote:
On Tue, 15 Aug 2017 15:04:47 -0000 (UTC)
Recliner wrote:
Robin9 wrote:
I'm pleased that at least one other person agrees that it is at best
an unnecessary extra layer of government. At worst, which is what
we have experienced, it enables people of prejudice to indulge their
prejudices to the detriment of the orderly functioning of London.
The few benefits we have received, like Crossrail, we would probably
have received anyway.
Yes, that was already in the works, but the mayor fought to keep its budget
intact. However, I don't think we'd have got the Overground and its
expansion without a mayor.
I don't have a problem with a mayor per se, but I do have a problem with this
particular major. He's a duplicitous little **** and I wouldn't trust him
further than he could throw Ali Desai.
To pick just a random person, right?
Not random at all you stupid gimp - Khan worked on Desai's defense when he was
a solicitor along with a host of other obnoxious individuals. He also actively
persued the police for fatuous compensation claims and yet now he sits his
scrawny arse in city hall, in charge of the Met. Why don't you try learning
to use google.
You really are a horrible little (in every sense which matters, I have no
doubt) racist.
LOL
Thats the best you can come up with, seriously?!
--
Spud