View Single Post
  #16   Report Post  
Old December 15th 17, 05:40 PM posted to uk.transport.london,misc.transport.urban-transit,uk.railway
Charles Ellson[_2_] Charles Ellson[_2_] is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Sep 2012
Posts: 498
Default London's Elizabeth Line's disjointed introduction

On Fri, 15 Dec 2017 05:49:36 +0000, Basil Jet
wrote:

On 2017\12\14 11:21, e27002 aurora wrote:

Strangely LT/LRT/TfL have regressed. When they built the Victoria
Line back in the 1960s they made interchange so easy. Amid Beeching,
and the general decline during that period, the Victoria Line shines
as a real achievement.


It's not so strange. Deep piled buildings were rare when the Victoria
Line was built, and the restriction against tunnelling beneath buildings
which existed when the earlier lines were built had been repealed,

IMU nothing was repealed; the shallower lines in the past involved a
far greater risk of infringing on deep foundations/basements (hence
lines following roads) and potential claims for subsidence and
similar. The land occupied by the line (at the relevant levels below
ground) could/can be obtained either by negotiated purchase or by the
associated legislation transferring ownership compulsorily.

so
the Victoria Line planners had freedom like no-one before or since.