Everything we know about traffic-calming is wrong
"Velvet" wrote in message
...
Just zis Guy, you know? wrote:
On Sun, 20 Jun 2004 20:08:54 GMT, "Richard J."
wrote in message
:
... because people driving in a vulnerable vehicle would drive more
safely? That idea didn't seem to work before seat belts were invented,
when occupants used to die by being ejected through the windscreen.
Indeed it still happens.
On the other hand, they drive less carefully when protected by
airbags, abs and seatbelts.
Guy
Not all of them do, ta :-) I don't rely on ABS to stop me quicker - I
use it to even out the fact that the car in front probably has it and
will stop quicker than I can if I don't have it... so my driving hasn't
snipped
Bit of a myth that ABS enables a vehicle to stop quicker, in fact it can
have the opposite effect. It's purpose is to enable the vehicle to be
steered while braking hard, which without ABS often results in a skid and
loss of control.
|