View Single Post
  #210   Report Post  
Old July 24th 19, 06:47 PM posted to uk.railway,uk.transport.london
Charles Ellson[_2_] Charles Ellson[_2_] is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Sep 2012
Posts: 498
Default Dual SIM phones was:Worker killed by Southern train was covering for brother

On Wed, 24 Jul 2019 08:52:08 +0100,
wrote:

On 24/07/2019 05:20, Charles Ellson wrote:
On Tue, 23 Jul 2019 23:25:58 -0000 (UTC), Recliner
wrote:

wrote:
On 23/07/2019 23:12, Recliner wrote:
wrote:
On 23/07/2019 22:21, Recliner wrote:
wrote:
On 23/07/2019 17:27, Clank wrote:
MissRiaElaine Wrote in message:
calls to German mobiles costs ?20 per month. My mother-in-law now has a
mobile instead of a land line in her OAP home.
So how do you get broadband..? *Reliable and fast* mobile broadband is
still some way off, certainly here in the UK.

That's because the UK has ****ing terrible infrastructure.

I just did a quick speedtest.net test of my mobile broadband:

https://www.speedtest.net/my-result/a/5143807298


Unfortunately the UK population seems more interested in blaming
foreigners and electing clowns than actually doing anything about
said woeful infrastructure, so ¯\_(?)_/¯.


23-07-2019 16:38:46 (GMT) 10.4 Mbps 0.5 Mbps EE
23-07-2019 15:54:27 (GMT) 8.2 Mbps 0.5 Mbps EE
23-07-2019 15:52:52 (GMT) 8.0 Mbps 0.6 Mbps EE
23-07-2019 15:51:23 (GMT) 3.1 Mbps 0.6 Mbps EE
23-07-2019 15:49:57 (GMT) 9.1 Mbps 0.6 Mbps EE
23-07-2019 15:41:25 (GMT) 6.1 Mbps 0.6 Mbps EE
23-07-2019 15:38:20 (GMT) 7.7 Mbps 0.6 Mbps EE
23-07-2019 15:23:15 (GMT) 1.3 Mbps 0.4 Mbps EE

This is my crap broadband this afternoon.


Is that mobile (4G), WiFi or wired data?

Sorry. Wired internet.

The amazing thing is I've managed to persuade EE something is wrong!


Is that ADSL or VDSL (ie, FTTC)? It would be mediocre for the former, but
terrible for the latter.

For a period I was getting similar poor performance from my FTTC line. I
kept complaining, and each time they sent an Openreach technician who
usually got me back up to 50Mbps download/10 upload, but it didn't last.
Finally, I told BT that I'd had enough, and demanded that they release me
from my contract. They reluctantly agreed, and I've changed ISP. I've now
got my final BT bill with the hefty cancellation charge, which I hope they
will cancel as promised.

With my new ISP, I now get completely consistent speeds on a wired
connection (it's more variable on WiFi). You probably don't want to look at
the speeds I get now…
https://www.flickr.com/photos/recliner/48239986081/in/dateposted-friend/lightbox/

If I want faster, it's readily available, with no hardware changes, but the
price goes up. However, I really don't think I have any conceivable need
for more.

It's VDSL. My line is so bad that the maximum realistic speed is 13Mbps
which it has been since it was repaired a few weeks ago. Our evening
storm has just started and the speed has dropped again. Normally this
means the connections in my outside waterproof master socket (which
isn't waterproof) have corroded... again.

Outside ? Do you actually mean the terminal block ? None of the jacks
are made for outdoor use.

BT do have an outdoor waterproof socket available. It can be quite fun
as most engineers have not seen one before.

That's too bad, particularly the upload speeds. You must be a long way from
the cabinet.


Allegedly "They don't install them anymore, and OR engineers bypass
them on FTTC installs because it can cause interference and lower
speeds ......"
https://community.bt.com/t5/BT-Fibre...E/td-p/1667903
and
"BT Openreach will discontinue the use of the XNTE when current stocks
are exhausted."
https://www.run-it-direct.co.uk/blog...nte-xnte-6.php
both from 2016

Photographs suggest they aren't as sealed as an external electrical
box would be and that the ID connections don't have any sign of jelly
on them so they look like a potential place for corrosion as seems to
be backed up by mention of engineers bypassing them by crimping the
wires through.