Thread: Barking Reach
View Single Post
  #16   Report Post  
Old June 8th 21, 02:26 PM posted to
tim...[_2_] tim...[_2_] is offline
external usenet poster
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Aug 2020
Posts: 63
Default Barking Reach

"Roland Perry" wrote in message
In message , at 07:15:26 on Tue, 8 Jun 2021,
tim... remarked:

"Roland Perry" wrote in message
In message , at 18:08:07 on Sat, 5 Jun 2021,
Anna Noyd-Dryver remarked:
tim... wrote:

"Basil Jet" wrote in message

According to the new Modern Railways, the existing A13 is going to be
buried as it goes near Barking Reach to create room for more housing.
Meanwhile, the entire new railway to Barking Reach is built on a
They say that the water table is pretty high there, but while that
create problems for tunnelling, I don't think it would be too much of
problem for cut and cover.

I find it incredible that someone thinks that putting a restricted
highway in a tunnel is a cost effective way of releasing land for

if it was every restricted access road in London could be so re-sited.

But I don't see anyone suggesting that we do this with other roads.

Or even with us putting railways in tunnels so that they can be built
on top

Gerrard's Cross?

Several London stations, of which Victoria and Liverpool St are probably
the best known. Birmingham New St?

I don't think that the building of shops above a railway station concourse
(or even above the tracks), which are commercially enhanced by the value
of the footfall through the station,

You may have forgotten that the developments above London Victoria,
Liverpool St and Cannon St, to name but a few, are mainly offices.

Central London termini are still a fringe condition compared with suburban
rail lines (and roads, which is where we started)