Thread: Decks vs hinges
View Single Post
  #23   Report Post  
Old July 9th 04, 10:20 PM posted to uk.transport.london
Helen Deborah Vecht Helen Deborah Vecht is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Jul 2003
Posts: 676
Default Decks vs hinges

Annabel Smyth typed


On Fri, 9 Jul 2004 at 12:27:10, Robin May
wrote:
No it's not. I don't know where you got that idea from. Low floor
double deckers with wheelchair ramps are considered fully accessible
for wheelchair users. The fact that a wheelchair user could not get
upstairs in a double decker bendy bus is most certainly *not* the
reason that bendy buses are not double decker.

Er - ever heard of sarcasm? Modern buses are certainly accessible to
wheelchair users in a way that the Routemasters were not, but they are
far less accessible to people with other disabilities - the elderly, for
instance, who appreciate a helpful arm getting on and off, or those who
are able to stand and walk a little, but who now have to walk quite a
long
way down the bus to find a seat. If they can.


I think that although accessible buses have their advantages, the
disappearance of conductors actually raises more problems than it
solves.


Well said that lady!

Many double decker passengers are too lazy to go upstairs (most are
*much* more able-bodied than I am) and the buses would benefit from
conductors to encourage the punters upstairs. Too many buses are full
downstairs when upstairs seats are vacant. Drivers cannot let more
passengers board due to the crowding...

--
Helen D. Vecht:
Edgware.