"Piccadilly Pilot" wrote in message ...
Boltar wrote:
"Marratxi" wrote in
message ...
"Boltar" wrote in message
om...
Major snip

Seems to me like some of the people involved in transport planning
need to
look up the definition of "rapid" in the dictionary. Trolleybuses
may be
many things but rapid isn't one of them.

B2003

What are your experiences which back up that statement ? The old
London
trolleybuses were very quick indeed with extremely rapid
acceleration and if
outright speed had been a factor in their design I don't see why they
shouldn't have been fast too.
Baz

I was thinking more about the fact that like ordinary buses they get
stuck
in traffic. But talking about shear speed they may have good
acceleration
but most of the the old ones topped out at about 40 or 50mph and would
probably have dewired before they got to that speed anyway.


Given that trolleybuses are primarily an urban vehicle how high a speed
would expect them to reach?

Well if they don't go fast then they're not "rapid" are they which was the
whole point of this mini thread. I assume you know the meaning of the word.


Strange that I've never hear shearing force refered to as speed before. It's
always been phrased in terms of the pressure required.

You should be a stand up, you'd have them rolling in the aisles. If you're
going to play spot the typo I suggest you look to your own posts first, they're
not exactly going to win any english prizes.

B2003