View Single Post
  #20   Report Post  
Old September 23rd 04, 05:58 PM posted to uk.transport.london,uk.railway
James Christie James Christie is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Sep 2004
Posts: 4
Default Technology for its own sake?

In message , Peter Masson
writes

"John Rowland" wrote in message
...

Snip
Something along the lines of a transponder at the start of each platform
which is detected by each door and enables the doors on the appropriate
side, and another one at the end of each platform which disables each door.
Other interlocking means that doors cannot actually open until the train has
stopped, and failsafe precautions could cancel the enabling if the train
hasn't stopped within, say, one minute of passing the transponder. Some
complications for platforms on reversible lines, but I can't help thinking
that something like this has the potential for being more reliable than the
GPS technology (Can GPS identify which line the train is on if adjoining
platforms are different lengths?)
Peter


With difficulty, because GPS has an accuracy of +/- 100m, unless of
course you are using Differential GPS, but that is mainly a maritime
system.
--
Regards,

James Christie

"In the beginning the Universe was created. This has made a lot of people very
angry and been widely regarded as a bad move."
- Douglas Adams