View Single Post
  #47   Report Post  
Old September 29th 04, 09:34 PM posted to uk.transport.london,uk.railway
PRAR PRAR is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Jun 2004
Posts: 89
Default Ken says yes to Crystal Palace tram extension

On Wed, 29 Sep 2004 12:23:45 +0930, (Aidan Stanger)
wrote:

PRAR wrote:

On Wed, 29 Sep 2004,
(Aidan Stanger) wrote:
So it does look like the tramlink will bring a worse train service to
Crystal Palace after all...

Are you sure there aren't the paths at Norwood Junction? What's limiting
their number?


Mostly they are all already in use by Southern, Thameslink & South
Eastern, and more are about to be swallowed up by back extensions of
the Uckfield services to London Bridge.


Wouldn't those use the fast lines?


Possibly, but rememeber there are 4 thameslinks, plus 2 Tattenhams and
the South Eastern already using those fast lines.



There's also a few odd operational lowlights including: trains to West
Croydon can only use platform 5 or 6, there's a flat crossing on top
of Cottage Bridge which creates conflicts on the slow lines,


Where is Cottage Bridge? I thought the only flat crossings in that area
were the depot access ones.


It's next to Lupin Bridge! It's where the Up London Bridge slow leaves
the Up Victoria slow (Milepost 9-68). Cottage Bridge is effectively
where the up London Bridge lines change from paired by use to paired
by direction.






Thameslink trains via Crystal Palace to East Croydon (and points
south) are always crossed to the fast lines North of Norwood Junction.

You could bring platform 7 back into use and use that for terminating
trains at though.


Apart from a signal upgrade, what would be required for a tube type
service on the Croydon lines?



PRAR
--
http://www.i.am/prar/
As long as people will accept crap, it will be financially profitable to dispense it. Dick Cavett
Please reply to the newsgroup. That is why it exists.
NB Anti-spam measures in force
- If you must email me use the Reply to address and not