View Single Post
  #40   Report Post  
Old August 6th 03, 09:54 AM posted to uk.transport.london,uk.transport
Steve Steve is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Jul 2003
Posts: 19
Default Crapita bailed-out over congestion charging

(Huge) wrote in :

Steve writes:
(Huge) wrote in :


[25 lines snipped]

Err, no. They're just not coming, period.


See
http://www.tfl.gov.uk/pdfdocs/cc/cc-...nth-report.pdf

I simply don't believe them.


Since you are not coming in any more *period* I doubt you are remotely
qualified to comment.

2.5. The majority of ex car-users have transferred to public transport


Lies.


Since you are not coming in any more *period* I doubt you are remotely
qualified to comment.



The same article had a list
of PT projects which have been postponed or scrapped because of lack of
funds. Oddly, you didn't quote that.


Err no there isn't


Perhaps the Evening Standard were lying as well, then?


Are you ****ed?

The story posted here was http://www.ananova.com/news/story/sm_804435.html

*not* the Evening Stanard and there is no list of PT projects.

So aside from claiming the everybody *period* is not coming in, which is
some what the opposite to reality you then talk about some other newspaper
(on which perhaps has an agenda regarding the CC).

You are no having a very good time in this thread.

There are a number of people on these newsgroups, myself included, who
simply will not visit a town where cars are discouraged. You only have
to look at the festering pit that is central Bedford to see that I am
not alone.


Whatever, not really relevant when "The majority of ex car-users have
transferred to public transport" though. So PT benefits from extra

revenue
and better journey times.


Except when it's a lie.


Since you are not coming in any more *period* I doubt you are remotely
qualified to comment.