On 5 Dec 2004 12:41:35 GMT, (Huge) wrote:

(Nick Cooper) writes:
On 4 Dec 2004 18:24:51 GMT, (Huge) wrote:

(Nick Cooper) writes:

[16 lines snipped]

--
1 Nick Cooper
2
3 [Carefully remove the detonators from my e-mail address to reply!]
4
5 The London Underground at War:
6 http://www.cwgcuser.org.uk/personal/...ra/lu/tuaw.htm
7 625-Online - classic British television:
8 http://www.625.org.uk
9 'Things to Come' - An Incomplete Classic:
10 http://www.thingstocome.org.uk

Too long.

Go **** yourself.

Who was it on here was asking why long sigs are a bad thing? Well, here's your
example.

1 Nick Cooper
2
3 [Carefully remove the detonators from my e-mail address to reply!]
4
5 The London Underground at War:
6 http://www.cwgcuser.org.uk/personal/...ra/lu/tuaw.htm
7 625-Online - classic British television:
8 http://www.625.org.uk
9 'Things to Come' - An Incomplete Classic:
10 http://www.thingstocome.org.uk

Too long.

a) My signature is less than 310 characters - less than 5 complete
lines on a standard 70 character wrap, i.e.e lett than the six line
recommended limit.

b) Not use of "recommended" in (a).

c) There's a delimiter in there.

c) Go **** yourself, you ****, because what I put in my sig is none of
your ****ing business.