On Mon, 18 Apr 2005, Dave Arquati wrote:

Tom Anderson wrote:
On Mon, 18 Apr 2005, Dave Arquati wrote:

Tom Anderson wrote:

On Sun, 17 Apr 2005, asdf wrote:

and they are seriously considering re-extending the Bakerloo to
Watford and re-assessing the Silverlink services - they consider
that there is an over-supply of service to central London between
Wealdstone and Queen's Park.

I think people here are underestimating how popular Euston is as a
destination

So, how about adding *more* trains to the Euston service, and running
it on a tube-like basis?

The original problem is that TfL consider there not to be sufficient
demand to sustain the *current* level of service to central London
(whether that's Oxford Circus etc or Euston only) - I highly doubt
that an *increased* level of service would be viable - certainly not
fundable.

I thought that the problem was south of Harrow, which is really about
having all the Bakerloos, which people don't want, alongside the
handful of Silverlinks, which people do want. Granted, running 12 tph
of each is definitely overkill (there's 4 + 7-14 at the moment, i
think), but the solution can't be to destroy the Silverlinks, it has
to be to cut back the Bakerloo and run more Silverlinks! How about 6
tph of each, or 8 of Silverlinks and 4 of Bakerloo?

If the Bakerloo was originally cut back to Wealdstone because more
passengers north of there wanted Euston, then there must be a sizeable
number of passengers south of Wealdstone who want the Bakerloo - and the
number probably increases towards the centre - which would make cutting
back the Bakerloo an unpopular move.

Probably true. The problem with the argument we're having is that we
actually don't know where people along that line want to go, and in what
numbers. We can make arguments either way, but we're really just guessing.

I wonder how much it varies over the course of the day; i wouldn't be at
all surprised if the demand for Euston is much higher than the demand for
the Bakerloo in the peaks, but much lower off-peak. This is rather
counterintuitive, but perhaps the changes you're backing should go ahead
off-peak, with the line basically being pure Bakerloo off-peak (all the
way to Watford, perhaps with a shuttle running Queen's Park - Euston),
with the Bakerloo being cut back to Queen's Park in the peaks, allowing a
reliable, high-frequency to Euston in the peaks.

From another point of view, I find it unlikely that more people want to
travel to the immediate vicinity of Euston than people who want to
continue further into either the City or West End.

I wouldn't be surprised if they did. Euston is at the heart of a major
employment hub, comparable to the City proper - Euston Road, Bloomsbury
and Holborn are all within walking distance of Euston.

Just because that's where UCL is doesn't mean it's an utter wasteland,
Dave .

The Bakerloo provides a service direct to the West End,

Sort of. Oxford Circus, Piccadilly Circus, Charing Cross; i guess it
depends on exactly where you want to go, but i always find these are too
far west for me (Piccadilly Circus? Come on! What's at Piccadilly
Circus?). I guess Oxford Circus is fine for Oxford Street if you want to
go shopping, though. I find the Northern line stops, easily reachable from
Euston, are much more useful. On the other hand, the Bakerloo does go to
Embankment, which is the best station for the south bank.

and to all parts of the City with a single change. Euston provides a
direct service to neither, requiring a single change in both cases.
Euston also has an interchange disadvantage compared to Bakerloo
stations, particularly when transferring to Euston Square.

True. As i mention above, though, some changes are easier - the Northern
line, basically.

Using the Bakerloo to reach the City must have a slightly slower journey
time, but the disbenefit for those travelling to the City is probably
well offset by the money saved from not running the Silverlink services.

You're not proposing reinvesting that money to help those people, though?
You want to take the resources away from the people of Bakerland (or
Watfordland, or Brent D. C. or whatever you want to call it) and
reallocate them to the citizens of North London Linia. Not that this is
necessarily a bad thing, of course; greatest need and all that.

I am going to stop trying to invent placenames based on railway lines now.

If the Bakerloo were cut back instead of Silverlink, then everyone
wishing to reach anywhere not in the immediate vicinity of Euston will
have to change to the Underground - but if the Bakerloo provides the
sole service, then only passengers travelling to the City have to change
- and they had to anyway.

Unless they want to go to Euston or somewhere on the Northern line, which
i think a lot do.

tom

--
It involves police, bailiffs, vampires and a portal to hell under a tower block in Hackney.