View Single Post
  #31   Report Post  
Old May 30th 05, 10:02 AM posted to uk.transport.london
Brimstone Brimstone is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Apr 2004
Posts: 668
Default Why can't LU cope with a signal failure?

Boltar wrote:
[+] For example, on 1953-04-08 twelve passengers were killed in a
collision just in rear of signal A491, which had failed. The driver
of the rear train failed to control his speed after tripping past
A489.


And in other news hundreds died in Comet airliner crashes caused
by metal fatigue. Good thing we didn't keep on pressuring aircraft
and flying so high else who knows how many other people would
have died!

Are you seriously suggesting that 50 years later the controllers
still wouldn't know that there was a train on the section ahead of
a stuck signal and so to warn the driver behind?


Much of the railway works on Automatic signals. These are not repeated in
any signal cabin or control room. To do so would be wasteful of taxpayers
money.