Peter Vos wrote:

Ed Lake wrote:



If there were two people involved, I would think that they would have
hit two separate areas of London. If the job CAN be done by one person,
then there is simply no reason to involve anyone else.



You may be right, I just think it is wise to avoid getting locked into
any one theory at this point because you can get tunnel vision. That
is exactly what happened with the Beltway Snipers...everyone was so hot
for white box trucks they let the perps car go on more than one
occasion.

I think for now "one maybe two" is a good conservative theory. You
certainly don't need to invoke a grand conspiracy much less try to tie
in Zarqawi... as some reports have suggested.

Peter,

I'm not locked into a one man theory. I just feel that IF it could have
been done by one person, then it almost certainly WAS done by one person
and that needs to be checked out as soon as possible.

AND, if it was done by one person, then knowing the times of arrivals of
the various trains would tell you where the culprit was at almost every
moment he was inside King's Cross Station!

That means you can find him on the surveillance camera tapes going from
point A to point B to point C.

If you have more than one person involved, then finding the culprit on
surveillance tapes gets vastly more complicated. So, I would have
people verify that it was not done by a single person before discounting
that idea. That's all I'm saying.

The objective is to get the guy - regardless of whether he's al Qaeda,
IRA, an anti-G8 anarchist or just some lone nut on a crazy mission.

Ed
anthraxinvestigation.com