"Anthropy" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 11 Jul 2005 20:26:21 +0100, "encyclopedia"
wrote:


"Anthropy" wrote in message
. ..
On Sat, 9 Jul 2005 22:09:50 +0100, "encyclopedia"
wrote:


"Ken Ehrett" wrote in message
m...


This of course is a non-response by Assthrobby designed solely to draw
attention away from his idiotic claims about minimum casualties.
Don't expect him to explain his silly theory about minimum casualties
when bombs were detonated in an enclosed space at the very point in
time when the largest number of people would be occupying that space.
All you will get at that point is name calling and misdirection.


It seems that is all I can expect from the fool is indeed non-response
and
evasion. He/she knows nothing about the subject to hand. I have seen
much
of
what happened - given my job

I didn't know the public toilets in Victoria station had been hit.

Were you worried that one of your cruising venues had been hit?

You tell me, you work there.

Yet another one of your erroneous assumptions to add to the growing list. It
is noted that you have not answered the question put to you - again.
Obviously because you cannot. Now go to your room without supper.