On Tue, 12 Jul 2005 09:19:03 +0100, "encyclopedia"
wrote:
"Anthropy" wrote in message
.. .
What question?
The question that has been put to you several times now in this thread and
on each occasion all you have done is offer up evasion - as you have again.
Obviously it seems that you cannot answer it and you have been left cornered
and struggling. If you evade again it will be an admittance on your part
that you are nothing but a lame troll.
You have said that "I can confidently state that the American invasion and
subsequent occupation and slaughter of 100,000 innocent Iraqi civilians in
Iraq and Afghanistan has led directly to the deaths of 49 innocent British
civilians in London last Thursday."
I have asked that you offer up direct and incontrovertible proof that allows
you to *"confidently state"*
Now given that you contradict yourself in the post you made:
"Anthropy" wrote in message
news
by saying
"The question has not been answered neither has the identity of the group
who planted the bombs."
As yet the identity of the bombers - as you have noted - are not known.
Though not likely - it is possible that they are the IRA or an animal rights
organisation. Hell they could even be the Anthropy Association for the
Violent Enforcement of which Colour is the New Black.
So on the one hand you say that the identity of the group who planted the
bombs is unknown yet you seem able to "confidently state that the American
invasion and subsequent occupation and slaughter of 100,000 innocent Iraqi
civilians in Iraq and Afghanistan has led directly to the deaths of 49
innocent British civilians in London last Thursday."
So once more I ask that you offer up direct and incontrovertible proof to
back up the reason you have that allows you to "confidently state"
What question?