View Single Post
  #5   Report Post  
Old July 17th 05, 07:44 PM posted to uk.railway,uk.transport.london
David Hansen David Hansen is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Jul 2003
Posts: 376
Default Tripcocks on 165s

On Sun, 17 Jul 2005 20:03:53 +0100 someone who may be "RPM"
wrote this:-

Only the tripcock on the leading vehicle is "active" on a 165/168.

If two units are coupled together the tripcocks on the two cabs that are
coupled tend to trip but this does not prevent the train from moving.


That probably/possibly involves the tripcock arms on the rear units
regularly striking a trackside trainstop arm at considerable speed,
once on each trip. This will be where the train enters the area
fitted with LT signalling. That can't be good for the life of the
arms and they are likely to break off at the point when they need to
work.

It would be better for the arms to be automatically moved out of the
way when coupled up.


--
David Hansen, Edinburgh | PGP email preferred-key number F566DA0E
I will always explain revoked keys, unless the UK government
prevents me by using the RIP Act 2000.