View Single Post
  #70   Report Post  
Old July 19th 05, 04:26 PM posted to alt.nuke.the.usa,uk.local.london,uk.transport.london
Sarah Czepiel Sarah Czepiel is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Jul 2005
Posts: 85
Default TIME TO NUKE PAKISTAN!!!!!!!

On Tue, 19 Jul 2005 10:46:08 +0100, sharky wrote:

Sarah Czepiel wrote:
On Mon, 18 Jul 2005 02:09:11 +0100, sharky wrote:


Yes. We stomped a mud hole in the "arse" of the British not that long
ago.

Where was that then? When you backed us so fully in the Falklands? How
many troops did you send?



This will save you quite a bit of time.
http://answers.google.com/answers/threadview?id=50104


In proving you did '**** all'

My question was 'How many troops did you send'
The answer seems to be 'NONE'


You asked THREE questions:

1.Where was that then?
2. When you backed us so fully in the Falklands?
3. How many troops did you send?

I answered ALL THREE with my site, ya goofy ****.

" Other researchers have confirmed the "supportive maintenance"
efforts of the U.S. of fuel, missiles, etc*, and Pres Reagan did offer
such military aid as mentioned below....."


"Although never officially acknowledged there are reports that during
the conflict the United States offered Britain the loan of a US Navy
aircraft carrier should the worst happen to either Invincible or
Hermes"

Oh great, IF you lose your aircraft carrier, you can borrow one of ours,
but you'll have to drive it yourselves!


Your RN isn't capable of operating a sophisticated air craft carrier?
In that case I'm very glad you didn't need one of ours.

Basically:

""Across the Atlantic, President Reagan tries to stay neutral and
agrees to Secretary Haig starting his shuttle diplomacy......
....(Activity in) Washington D.C. - President Ronald Reagan, Secretary
of State Alexander Haig, British ambassador Sir Nicholas Henderson,
Argentine ambassador Snr Esteban Takacs.....Over the next four weeks,
America's attempts to be even-handed are not appreciated by Mrs
Thatcher, although in US terms, having to choose between Latin
American friend and main European ally is no easy matter..."

That sums it up, **** our main ally, prevaricate.


If you can get through it, read Maggie's book. Just do it.

* The vital part of that "etc" was the US gave Biritan satellite intel
and navigational assistance.

Oooh, we got some satellite images - wow. Navigational assistance?
********, we know where the Falklands are - we own them!


You didn't have satellite intel which we provided you and you needed
to use our navsats. You didn't have any in position to do the job at
the time.

Now please get ****ed since you've proven you can't grasp your own
military history.


You don't even read your own cites and just prove your own country's
lack of commitment to pacts with allies, unless there is some oil involved.


Thanks for reminding me! We're such great guys we also provided your
fleet with oilers during your two week trip south.

Iraq would have gone well if half of Europe hadn't sent troops rather
than some footage of Bagdad "Here you go Bush, attack that building
behind the camel"


No wonder half the world hates Merkins, you are so up your own arses you
can't see what supercilliuos ******s you are.


Oh, on a finishing note
"We will not be afraid of terrorists"
"No US personnel allowed inside the Greater London area"

Would be funny if not so lame.


You're only here because hardy injections of spunk from the US of A
kept your grandmothers legs open.

Now go get ****ed Sweetie, seriously. It'll improve your disposition
and clear up your skin problem.