View Single Post
  #47   Report Post  
Old July 20th 05, 01:05 AM posted to uk.railway,uk.transport.london
Charles Ellson Charles Ellson is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Sep 2004
Posts: 724
Default Tripcocks on 165s

On 19 Jul 2005 04:52:40 -0700, "M J Forbes"
wrote:

The leading tripcock will only hit a trainstop if the signal is being passed
at red, not usually done.

The rear tripcock is on the wrong side of the track to connect with the
trainstop.


So is that to imply that there's no tripcock-equipped lines that are
signalled for bi-directional working? Or if so, is there some
technical gubbins that will lower the "wrong-direction" cocks when a
train is running wrong line?

There are (as I said earlier in the thread) a few places on LU where
trains can go in either direction, terminal lines being the most
obvious. At these locations the "wrong way" trip levers will be seen
to lower as a train approaches to prevent rear-tripping. IIRC High
Street Kensington is such a place possibly with some short stretches
of bi-directional track on the southern approaches. The same possibly
also applies to the two through Met main line platforms at Baker
Street if they are still signalled to cope with reversing trains.