Thread: More bombs?
View Single Post
  #57   Report Post  
Old July 22nd 05, 12:16 PM posted to uk.transport.london,uk.railway
Graeme Wall Graeme Wall is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,715
Default More bombs?

In message
Guy Gorton wrote:

On Fri, 22 Jul 2005 11:12:15 +0000 (UTC), Bruce Fletcher
wrote:


There is no such thing as a "shoot to injure or disable" policy, if you
(police or armed forces) shoot someone your intention is to kill them.


I have never understood this policy. Even in the armed forces a
wounded prisoner may be a source of information and certainly is to
the police.


The use of firearms is because the police believe there is imminent danger to
life, if you merely wound an armed man he can still shoot, a suicide bomber
can still set off his bomb, the only way to guarantee safety in these
situations is to kill. Dead men don't shoot back.

--
Graeme Wall
This address is not read, substitute trains for rail.
Transport Miscellany at http://www.greywall.demon.co.uk/rail/index.html